
Procurement and consulting in IT and telecoms are increasingly about making the right choices in an ever more complex landscape. Technology is evolving rapidly, delivery models are changing, and the demands for security, flexibility, and cost control are becoming ever clearer.
For many businesses, IT has become one of the biggest cost drivers. Yet, it is surprisingly often unclear what is actually being paid for, which services are in active use – and whether the contractual framework is adapted to current needs.
IT agreements entered into many years ago continue to exist, even though security requirements, working patterns, and technological assumptions have changed significantly over time. Nevertheless, such agreements are rarely reviewed holistically after their initial signing.
So how do you know who the right supplier is for you?
Renegotiating IT contracts isn't primarily about squeezing the price. It's about cost control, risk management, and crucially, ensuring that agreements and actual usage are aligned.
Without this coordination, both economic and technological decisions will be made on a flawed basis.
Control over the IT agreement gives:
For management as a whole, this provides better conditions for managing IT as an integrated part of the business and not as an isolated cost area. Furthermore, it increases ownership of the agreement for those who are to decide which is the right IT partner and supplier at any given time.
In many businesses, payment for IT services that are no longer in use can still be found, often as a result of overlapping deliveries from multiple suppliers and license agreements that have never been adjusted after moving to the cloud. Such historical choices are rarely the result of poor decisions, but rather of a lack of follow-up over time. Over time, however, this can lead to unnecessary complexity and reduced transparency in IT deliveries.
The challenge is that this doesn't just affect costs. Over time, it also impacts governance, responsibility, and the basis for decision-making – particularly when agreements, technology, and practices diverge.
When IT agreements are not updated, security, compliance, and responsibility can also become unclear. Old SLAs, outdated security requirements, and a lack of flexibility can create both operational and legal risk. This becomes particularly evident when faced with new regulatory requirements and increased use of cloud-based services.
A structured review of IT agreements provides management with better insight into which services actually create value, how capacity and licensing are dimensioned, and whether the contractual framework supports current security and operational requirements.
Often, the conclusion isn't changing suppliers, but a better-tailored IT agreement.
Knut Riiber, Senior Advisor Adite
Many businesses only recognise the value of structured analysis and renegotiation once IT becomes a manageable area again, rather than just a cost. It is often here that the gap between contractual frameworks, practice, and actual needs becomes apparent.
Businesses that take control in this way generally achieve both lower costs, a simpler contractual structure, and higher quality in their deliveries. Most importantly, IT becomes a manageable area – not a black hole in the budget.
Many businesses are aware that IT costs have increased, but lack a comprehensive overview of what they are actually paying for – and what commitments are tied up in their contractual agreements. A structured review of IT contracts provides a better basis for decision-making, both financially and in terms of security. This lays the groundwork for deciding whether they are with the right supplier, or should explore alternative suppliers in the market.
Adite assists companies with the analysis and renegotiation of IT contracts., with the aim of better control, correct dimensioning, and more value from existing agreements.
🔘 Speak with a counsellor
🔘 Find out more about procurement and consulting